Overall Readiness
81%
Conflict Cost
128 ms (25%)
Late-Session Drop
+10 ms (5%)
Available today, but not at peak. The main issue is not clean speed — it is slower decisions under conflict and reduced control later in the session.
RESPONSE SPEED
First Response Speed
How quickly do you respond when the cue is clear?
Avg reaction | Dashed line = worst observed
Bilateral reactions are highly symmetrical (4ms gap), though occasional outliers appear on both sides (271ms left, 255ms right).
Coach: "When does his reaction look slower than his best 183ms — cluttered reads or ambiguous cues?"
Best Verified Speed
What is your fastest proven response in clean conditions?
Sebastian demonstrates peak reaction speeds of 183ms (left) and 191ms (right) when the read is clear.
Coach: "Can he access that 183ms speed more consistently on complex plays, or only when it's a clean breakaway?"
Response Consistency
How repeatable is your response speed across trials?
Fastest
183ms
Mean
214ms
Slowest
271ms
88 ms spread
Variability: 8.4% CV
(Lower % = tighter clustering)
Reaction times range from 183ms (fastest) to 271ms (slowest), with typical performance around 214ms. The 88ms spread and 8.4% variability show how tightly his reactions cluster.
A tighter range and lower CV means more predictable, consistent reaction timing. Compare this across sessions to track whether variance increases with fatigue or training load.
DECISION UNDER CONFLICT
Conflict Decision Speed
HOW QUICKLY DO YOU CHOOSE AND COMMIT WHEN INFORMATION CONFLICTS?
Decision timing slows from 187ms (clear) to 214ms (complex) — 27ms interference cost. Quality holds, but delay compresses motor prep time.
Coach: "Train faster choose-and-commit responses when the task becomes less straightforward."
Decision Stability in Chaotic Moments
WHEN THE VISUAL PICTURE GETS MESSY, DOES THE READ STAY CLEAN?
Correct choices in simple condition
Correct choices under conflict
Accuracy under conflict is 75%, with a 6% drop from congruent to incongruent performance, showing that choice quality declines when interference rises.
Reinforce correct decision-making under conflict, not just faster responding.
Brain-to-Body Alignment
How cleanly does processing translate into movement output?
Brain and body start aligned (98%) and decline together to 78% by session end.
Manage late-match cognitive load in minutes 75-90.
STABILITY UNDER LOAD
Decision Accuracy Under Conflict
How often do you choose correctly when the task becomes harder?
Accuracy under conflict is 75%, with a 6% drop from congruent to incongruent performance, showing that choice quality declines when interference rises.
Coach: "Reinforce correct decision-making under conflict, not just faster responding."
Late-Session Stability
Does timing stay intact as load builds later in the session?
Early Session
Late Session
Scale: 0-100 | Bars show left vs right motor quality
Timing precision declines from 90 to 77 — a 13-point drop. Late-match saves occur with reduced neural coordination.
Coach: "Compare dive timing at minute 15 vs 85. Does late-match execution look as crisp?"
Session Drop-Off
How much does performance fade across the full session?
Neural control declines from 100 to 48 across the session — a 52-point drop indicating significant fatigue.
Monitor late-match load and consider session duration limits.
Performance Alerts
Performance Degradation Signals
Mechanical / Injury-Adjacent Signals
Risk flags show late-session performance drift — timing precision and bilateral symmetry degrade as cognitive load accumulates. Early-session capacity is strong (92-92 symmetry, ~90 precision); the constraint is sustaining these levels under fatigue.
Coach: Monitor minutes 75-90 for asymmetry emergence. If late reps get sloppy, implement micro-resets (10-15 sec) between intense sequences.